Opinion

Oh how sad and embarrassing. Donald Trump wants Joe Biden impeached so bad. So what does he do? He goes to his band of buffoons and tells them to make it happen. What do they say? OK! They put together this sham of an investigation with no evidence. But wait! What is this? You mean they now how a star witness? Oh, it’s on. They’re on their way to a major impeachment. So the circus begins. They want the press there, they want this in the headlines, they want to come out looking like good ol’ boys in front of their great orange (cult) leader. So James Comer (idiot #1) goes out on a press campaign spreading the word that Hunter Biden is guilty and so is his Dad. And HE’S going to do something about it for the American people. He talks about this special document he has and his star witness. Well, we all know how the story ends. The star FBI informant witness was playing these clowns like a fiddle. He was lying his ass off. None of what he said was true. James Comer seemed to now fumble in his little press interviews. He’s trying to save his bloated face by claiming that’s not all the evidence he has. James, it’s over. Stop while you’re still a loser. Just one question, aren’t you embarrassed?

While America is trying to get their act together. While infighting continues and the country has never been so divided, China’s President Xi is ready to pounce calling for a ‘new world order.’ Russia’s leader Putin is all for it! Abandoning the summit represents a significant shift in China’s foreign policy. In recent years, President Xi seemed determined to position China as a Western alternative. However, he is now strategically repositioning his nation as a direct adversary, prepared to forge a bloc that counters the United States, its allies, and the international institutions they uphold.

The one million dollar question is when are Republicans going to finally rid themselves of this toxic mold? Time and time again they stick with him and they are constantly taking losses. You would think at some point someone would stand up and say this is not working.

Allen takes calls from both sides but rabid calls from MAGA get in and let him know what’s on their minds. One talks about how many are planning to get Trump elected no matter what.

It’s now come to where Donny’s followers no believe ANYTHING other than what he tells them. For those that don’t believe this is not a cult, take the time to watch these four interviews. These people represent a large portion of the Trump base. They worship him like he’s the second coming. We’ve heard all that before but the problem now is they all refuse to believe reality. They have created their own universe where the only truth lies with their cult leader. You’ll hear the same narrative with all these separate interviews. Each person basically says the same thing. They refuse to believe the truth. They worship Donald Trump. The believe that the truth lies with Trump himself. AND, Trump can do and say whatever he wants and they will support him to the end.

In the current political landscape, it is no secret that the most effective way to secure funds for one’s campaign is to adopt a highly controversial stance. The individuals who make the most noise tend to attract substantial financial support from both the radical left and the radical right. Prominent figures such as Marjorie Taylor Greene, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Jim Jordan have grasped the dynamics of modern fundraising. They have become adept campaign fundraisers by capitalizing on the concept that more exposure on television equates to more financial backing. This trend is rapidly spreading to other politicians who are keen to emulate the success of these seasoned campaigners. The prevailing strategy seems to prioritize generating a significant buzz through being vociferous, contentious, and confrontational, often overshadowing the objective of effectively governing and legislating. Marjorie Taylor Greene, in particular, has mastered the art of being loud, obnoxious, and provocative, thereby maximizing her fundraising potential. Her approach is to seize any opportunity to make audacious statements, promptly dispatching texts and emails to her supporters with headlines that read, “Look At What I Did For You.” The pivotal question that arises is: Who are the contributors supporting this seemingly outlandish conduct? It is the radical elements on both the right and the left ends of the political spectrum who are the primary patrons of this political theater. These individuals, often immersed in ideologically driven media, are eager to allocate their hard-earned funds to sustain this spectacle, perpetuating a cycle where controversial rhetoric is rewarded with financial reinforcement.